In a significant judicial decision, the Appeals Criminal Chamber at the Marrakech Court of Appeal has redefined the legal landscape surrounding a high-profile case concerning the unlawful practice of dentistry in a non-licensed clinic in the town of Qalaat Sraghna. The ruling, identified as appeal number 2119 and dated April 13, 2026, overturned a previous acquittal, sentencing the main accused, identified as (A.N.), to two months of suspended imprisonment after substantial evidence surfaced proving his involvement in the "unauthorized practice of medicine." This decision was firmly grounded in the accumulated evidence and testimonies presented throughout the proceedings.
The court emphasized that the possession of specialized medical equipment, such as dental chairs and surgical tools, by individuals lacking the credentials of a licensed dentist constitutes a blatant violation of Law No. 07.05, which regulates the profession. This breach stands irrespective of any other justifications that might be presented.
Moreover, the judicial body exonerated other parties who had previously faced accusations during the initial phase of the case, declaring both the veterinarian (F.A.) and the witness (A.Q.) innocent of the charges against them. This finding reaffirmed the integrity of the legal processes undertaken in this case and dismissed any notion of malicious intent behind the legal actions.
This ruling is viewed as a strong commitment to safeguarding public health amidst the dangers posed by unregulated medical practices, particularly in the field of dentistry, which demands exacting standards regarding sterilization and professional qualification to avert serious health complications that could endanger patients' well-being.
Furthermore, the decision effectively concludes the public debate that had surrounded the case, especially following the dissemination of inaccurate information across various platforms. The judiciary underscored that the law does not recognize any professional status outside the legally defined framework and that medical practices are only permissible by qualified professionals.
By addressing civil claims and ordering compensation for the affected party, the appellate court has delivered a clear message that prioritizing citizen health remains paramount, and any violation of the regulations governing medical professions will be met with strict legal repercussions.
As reported by ar.hibapress.com.
