Casablanca Bar Association Takes a Stand Against Nationwide Strike
The Casablanca Bar Association has publicly distanced itself from the general and indefinite strike called by the Association of Moroccan Bar Associations (ABAM) in response to a proposed law regulating the legal profession. This decision highlights a significant rift within the legal community, as the Casablanca Bar has opted to maintain its activities and assert its autonomy against the national movement. As reported by the daily newspaper Assabah, the Casablanca Bar's refusal to participate in the strike marks a crucial division within the profession.
Shortly after ABAM announced the continuation of an open-ended strike initiated the previous week, the Casablanca Bar Association made its opposition clear. In a statement, the Casablanca Bar reaffirmed its commitment to the practice of law while rejecting any complete cessation of activities. This dissent was officially communicated following an extraordinary council meeting, emphasizing the need for mutual respect regarding the diverse positions held by different bar associations across the nation.
Moreover, the Casablanca Bar Council has resolved to keep its sessions open to closely monitor developments surrounding the legislative discussions within the House of Councillors. The organization has reserved the right to take appropriate measures based on the legislative process's progress while reinforcing its unwavering commitment to defending the independence of the profession and its historical achievements.
ABAM's Response and Concerns about Legislative Developments
In contrast, the Association of Moroccan Bar Associations has reported a highly positive outcome from the week of protests, citing widespread mobilization and strict adherence to the strike call by lawyers nationwide. The ABAM views this exceptional participation rate as indicative of the legal community's unity and determination to uphold the dignity and independence of justice.
Nevertheless, the ABAM has expressed serious concerns regarding the current legislative trajectory in Parliament. It has accused the Minister of Justice of diverting discussions toward marginal issues, thus neglecting critical matters such as lawyer immunity, the independence of the bar, and self-regulation. The association describes the ministry's approach as a "circumvention" of previously established agreements and compromises. In light of this situation, ABAM has earnestly called upon the Prime Minister to intervene directly to ensure adherence to these commitments. The association has announced that its members remain in a state of permanent mobilization, ready to undertake all necessary actions to advance their union's objectives.
As reported by fr.le360.ma.
